In defense of non-reductionism in the epistemology of testimony
pp. 3227-3237
Résumé
Almost everyone agrees that many testimonial beliefs constitute knowledge. According to non-reductionists, some testimonial beliefs possess positive epistemic status independent of that conferred by perception, memory, and induction. Recently, Jennifer Lackey has provided a counterexample to a popular version of this view. Here I argue that her counterexample fails.
Détails de la publication
Publié dans:
(2014) Synthese 191 (14).
Pages: 3227-3237
DOI: 10.1007/s11229-014-0443-0
Citation complète:
Perrine Timothy, 2014, In defense of non-reductionism in the epistemology of testimony. Synthese 191 (14), 3227-3237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-014-0443-0.