Revue | Volume
New thinking about scientific realism
Volume 194 (9)
Détails | Table des matières
Scientific realism
quo vadis? introduction
pp.3187-3201
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1493-x
Epistemic selectivity, historical threats, and the non-epistemic tenets of scientific realism
pp.3203-3219
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1103-3
Understanding the selective realist defence against the pmi
pp.3221-3232
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1082-4
Predictive success, partial truth and duhemian realism
pp.3245-3265
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1305-8
Resisting the historical objections to realism
is Doppelt's a viable solution?
pp.3267-3290
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1087-z
(Structural) realism and its representational vehicles
pp.3311-3326
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-015-0879-x
A pragmatic, existentialist approach to the scientific realism debate
pp.3327-3346
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1015-2
The applicability of mathematics to physical modality
pp.3361-3377
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1067-3
Reflections on new thinking about scientific realism
pp.3379-3392
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1514-9
Epistemic injustice in utterance interpretation
pp.3421-3443
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-015-0942-7
Unification, the answer to resemblance questions
pp.3501-3521
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-015-0969-9
The subject matter of phenomenological research
existentials, modes, and prejudices
pp.3543-3562
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1106-0Détails de la publication
Revue: Synthese
Volume: 194
Numéro: 9
Année: 2017
Citation complète:
Ruttkamp-Bloem Emma (dir.), 2017, New thinking about scientific realism, Synthese 194 (9).