Revue | Volume
Neuroscience and its philosophy
Volume 195 (5)
Détails | Table des matières
A neuropsychological challenge to the sentimentalism/rationalism distinction
pp.1873-1889
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1344-9
An interventionist approach to psychological explanation
pp.1909-1940
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1553-2
From symbols to icons
the return of resemblance in the cognitive neuroscience revolution
pp.1941-1967
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1578-6
Does the normative question about rationality rest on a mistake?
pp.2021-2038
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1314-2
Philosophical pictures about mathematics
Wittgenstein and contradiction
pp.2039-2063
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1317-z
Embodied cognition and temporally extended agency
pp.2089-2112
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1320-4
Bayes and the first person
consciousness of thoughts, inner speech and probabilistic inference
pp.2113-2140
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1321-3
Criteria of identity and the hermeneutic goal of ante rem structuralism
pp.2141-2153
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1325-z
Is imagination too liberal for modal epistemology?
pp.2155-2174
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1329-8
Du Bois' democratic defence of the value free ideal
pp.2227-2245
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1333-z
Carnap's epistemological critique of metaphysics
pp.2247-2265
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1335-x
Scientific revolutions, specialization and the discovery of the structure of dna
toward a new picture of the development of the sciences
pp.2267-2293
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1339-6Détails de la publication
Revue: Synthese
Volume: 195
Numéro: 5
Année: 2018
Citation complète:
Piccinini Gualtiero (dir.), 2018, Neuroscience and its philosophy, Synthese 195 (5).