Revue | Volume
Homo faber revisited
Volume 32 (2)
Détails | Table des matières
five risks of being unethical
pp.185-193
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-019-00354-xpostphenomenology and material engagement theory
pp.195-214
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-018-0321-7a pluralistic enactive take on the metaplasticity of early body ornamentation
pp.215-242
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-017-0296-9post-phenomenology and material engagement theory
pp.243-264
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-018-0310-xan enactive perspective on communities and technical practice in the middle stone age
pp.265-281
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-017-0300-4tool use, creativity and embodied cognition
pp.283-302
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-017-0292-0or, on the difference between smartphone and passenger driver distraction
pp.303-320
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-017-0297-8conceptualizing technology as a mediating milieu
pp.321-338
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-018-0309-3pp.339-362
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-018-0334-2conceptual, empirical, and experimental approaches
pp.363-378
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-019-00342-1Détails de la publication
Revue: Philosophy & Technology
Volume: 32
Numéro: 2
Année: 2019
Citation complète:
Ihde Don, Malafouris Lambros (dir.), 2019, Homo faber revisited: Postphenomenology and material engagement theory, Philosophy & Technology 32 (2).