Linguistique de l’écrit

Revue internationale en libre accès

Collections | Livre | Chapitre

206107

The invisible origin of legal language

thegrundnorm

William E Conklin

pp. 171-200

Résumé

The dominant strain of the Tradition, so far examined, has associated the authorizing origin of humanly posited laws with an author. The Tradition has offered two senses of an author. The first, associated with Hobbes and Rousseau, considered the author as the invisible creator of the institutional structure of civil society. The second, best manifested in the works of Austin and Bentham, considered the author as historically contingent. During his early and middle period, Bentham believed the legislature to be the sovereign historical author; Austin believed that the people authored the structure of legal institutions. I have emphasized in the previous chapter that, for Bentham and Austin, officials recognize the historical authors to be situated internal to the legal structure.

Détails de la publication

Publié dans:

Conklin William E (2001) The invisible origins of legal positivism: a re-reading of a tradition. Dordrecht, Springer.

Pages: 171-200

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-010-0808-2_8

Citation complète:

Conklin William E, 2001, The invisible origin of legal language: thegrundnorm. In W.E. Conklin The invisible origins of legal positivism (171-200). Dordrecht, Springer.