Linguistique de l’écrit

Revue internationale en libre accès

Collections | Livre | Chapitre

147784

How Husserl's and Searle's contextual model reformulates the discussion about the conceptual content of perception

Pol Vandevelde(Marquette University)

pp. 57-76

Résumé

I argue that Husserl's notion of horizon and Searle's notion of background offer a contextual model of perception that significantly reformulates the debate about the conceptual vs. nonconceptual content of perception. I illustrate the model by using a test case: the perception of an ancient Roman milestone—an example given by Husserl—which both Husserl and Searle consider to be a direct and immediate perception without inferences involved. I further differentiate Husserl's and Searle's views, arguing that Husserl's model has the advantage of accounting for the diachronic aspect of perception.

Détails de la publication

Publié dans:

Walton Roberto, Taguchi Shigeru, Rubio Roberto (2017) Perception, affectivity, and volition in Husserl's phenomenology. Dordrecht, Springer.

Pages: 57-76

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-55340-5_4

Citation complète:

Vandevelde Pol, 2017, How Husserl's and Searle's contextual model reformulates the discussion about the conceptual content of perception. In R. Walton, S. Taguchi & R. Rubio (eds.) Perception, affectivity, and volition in Husserl's phenomenology (57-76). Dordrecht, Springer.