Revue | Volume
Scientific realism quo vadis?
Volume 180 (2)
Détails | Table des matières
Editorial introduction to scientific realism quo vadis? theories, structures, underdetermination and reference
pp.79-85
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9610-0
Structural realism versus standard scientific realism
the case of phlogiston and dephlogisticated air
pp.87-101
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9607-8
Structural correspondence, indirect reference, and partial truth
phlogiston theory and Newtonian mechanics
pp.103-120
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9608-7
Saving the intuitions
polylithic reference
pp.121-137
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9601-1
Underdetermination, realism and empirical equivalence
pp.157-172
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9599-4
Reconsidering the miracle argument on the supposition of transient underdetermination
pp.173-187
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9600-2
Underdetermination as an epistemological test tube
expounding hidden values of the scientific community
pp.189-204
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9597-6
Metaphysical underdetermination
why worry?
pp.205-221
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9598-5
Carnap on theoretical terms
structuralism without metaphysics
pp.249-263
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9604-yDétails de la publication
Revue: Synthese
Volume: 180
Numéro: 2
Année: 2011
Citation complète:
Schurz Gerhard, Votsis Ioannis (dir.), 2011, Scientific realism quo vadis?: theories, structures, underdetermination and reference, Synthese 180 (2).