Why follow the royal rule?
pp. 1565-1590
Résumé
This note is a sequel to Huber (Synthese 191:2167–2193, 2014). It is shown that obeying a normative principle relating counterfactual conditionals and conditional beliefs, viz. the royal rule, is a necessary and sufficient means to attaining a cognitive end that relates true beliefs in purely factual, non-modal propositions and true beliefs in purely modal propositions. Along the way I will sketch my idealism about alethic or metaphysical modality.
Détails de la publication
Publié dans:
Dutant Julien, Fassio Davide, Meylan Anne (2017) Truth & epistemic norms. Synthese 194 (5).
Pages: 1565-1590
DOI: 10.1007/s11229-015-1004-x
Citation complète:
Huber Franz, 2017, Why follow the royal rule? Synthese 194 (5), Truth & epistemic norms, 1565-1590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-015-1004-x.