Linguistique de l’écrit

Revue internationale en libre accès

Collections | Livre

225671

Interpretation of law in the age of enlightenment

from the rule of the king to the rule of law

Édité parYasutomo MorigiwaMichael Stolleis Jean-Louis Halpérin

Résumé

This book examines the actual practice of the interpretation of law in the Age of Enlightenment versus the ideology of the Age and explains the reason for and difference between the two. The ideology of the Age of Enlightenment was that law, i.e., the will of the sovereign, can be explicitly and appropriately stated, thus making interpretation redundant. However, the reality was that in the 18th century, there was no one leading source of national law that would be the object of interpretation. Instead, there was a plurality of sources of law: the Roman Law, local customary law, and the royal ordinance. Yet, in deciding a case in a court of law, the law must speak with one voice, making interpretation to unify the norms inevitable. This book discusses the process involved and the role played by justification in terms of reason - the hallmark of Enlightenment.

Détails | Table des matières

Détails de la publication

Maison d'édition: Springer

Lieu de publication: Dordrecht

Année: 2011

Pages: 193

Collection: Law and Philosophy Library


Notice: Undefined index: serie_vol in /home/clients/b010bcc84441ff7c5adbaf4e922effaa/web/mom/module/pub/view-inc.php on line 486

: 95

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-1506-6

ISBN (hardback): 978-94-007-1505-9

ISBN (digital): 978-94-007-1506-6

Citation complète:

Morigiwa Yasutomo, Stolleis Michael, Halpérin Jean-Louis (éd.), 2011, Interpretation of law in the age of enlightenment: from the rule of the king to the rule of law. Dordrecht, Springer.