Linguistique de l’écrit

Revue internationale en libre accès

Livre | Chapitre

212304

Problems of a historical study of science

Wolf Lepenies

pp. 55-67

Résumé

Within a relatively short period of time the study of science (Wissenschaftsforschung) has become a unified discipline. The philosophy of science, the history of science (1) and the sociology of science no longer dismiss one another as auxiliary disciplines but exchange essential elements of their conceptual apparatus. As examples one might take Weizsäcker's conception of the history of science as being a philosophy of science, or Thomas Kuhn's attempt to establish a scientific-historical theory on the basis of a sociological category ('scientific community"). In this respect the study of science furnishes, from its own development, proof of the thesis that changes in the system of science are characterised less and less by the emergence of completely new disciplines or interdisciplinary programmes but rather by exchanges of parts of disciplines within established subjects and by an amalgamation of disciplines.

Détails de la publication

Publié dans:

Mendelsohn Everett, Weingart Peter, Whitley Richard (1977) The social production of scientific knowledge. Dordrecht, Springer.

Pages: 55-67

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-010-1186-0_3

Citation complète:

Lepenies Wolf, 1977, Problems of a historical study of science. In E. Mendelsohn, P. Weingart & R. Whitley (eds.) The social production of scientific knowledge (55-67). Dordrecht, Springer.