Collections | Livre | Chapitre
The physician as moral arbiter
pp. 23-31
Résumé
When asked to comment about the physician as moral arbiter, I thought it useful to begin by considering just what a moral arbiter would be. To speak of someone as a moral arbiter, or to speak of some group as functioning in that role, is to say that there is arbitration and that it concerns moral matters.
Détails de la publication
Publié dans:
Bondeson William B., Engelhardt Tristram, Spicker Stuart, White Jr Joseph M (1982) New knowledge in the biomedical sciences: some moral implications of its acquisition, possession, and use. Dordrecht, Springer.
Pages: 23-31
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-7723-5_2
Citation complète:
Gorovitz Samuel, 1982, The physician as moral arbiter. In W. B. Bondeson, T. Engelhardt, Spicker & J.M. White Jr (eds.) New knowledge in the biomedical sciences (23-31). Dordrecht, Springer.