Livre | Chapitre
To be is to be for the sake of something
Aristotle's arguments with materialism
pp. 19-33
Résumé
There are many "idealist" critiques of materialism, including as a natural philosophy. Early modern critiques often invoke a notion of 'soul" or "life" as a feature which the materialist either eliminates, or at least cannot account for. Here I examine an early and powerful critique of materialism in Aristotle, which brings out both his subtlety with regard to the nature of biological entities and, perhaps, his desire to find a "third way" between the pure idealism of Platonic forms and the equally pure chance-and-necessity of the atomists, who he calls the phusiologoi.
Détails de la publication
Publié dans:
Wolfe Charles (2016) Materialism: a historico-philosophical introduction. Dordrecht, Springer.
Pages: 19-33
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-24820-2_2
Citation complète:
Wolfe Charles, 2016, To be is to be for the sake of something: Aristotle's arguments with materialism. In C. Wolfe Materialism (19-33). Dordrecht, Springer.