Linguistique de l’écrit

Revue internationale en libre accès

Livre | Chapitre

188098

Hermeneutic vs. empiricist philosophy of science

Joseph Kockelmans

pp. 191-215

Résumé

When I started my studies in the philosophy of science in the early fifties, it was quite clear to me that logical positivism was the leading school in the philosophy of the natural sciences. This conception was strongly promoted by the Vienna Circle between 1923 and 1938, as well as later when the events leading to World War II saw the Circle members leaving Vienna and establishing themselves all over the world, particularly in the United States. In the United States, Carnap would soon become a leading figure, whereas in England, Popper eventually would become the main proponent.

Détails de la publication

Publié dans:

Ginev Dimitri, Cohen Robert S (1997) Issues and images in the philosophy of science: scientific and philosophical essays in honour of Azarya Polikarov. Dordrecht, Springer.

Pages: 191-215

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-5788-9_11

Citation complète:

Kockelmans Joseph, 1997, Hermeneutic vs. empiricist philosophy of science. In D. Ginev & R.S. Cohen (eds.) Issues and images in the philosophy of science (191-215). Dordrecht, Springer.