Linguistique de l’écrit

Revue internationale en libre accès

Collections | Livre | Chapitre

184351

Should auld acquaintance be forgot…?

Erazim Kohák

pp. 249-256

Résumé

Should auld acquaintance be forgot and never brought to mind? With all due respect to Robert Burns, I am beginning to think it might be a rather good idea. While cherishing old friends and long ago places, I grow ever more doubtful about remembrance as a philosophical strategy. Do we do well to think of knowledge as anamnesis, the recollection of what we had known long ago, before the world began to spin backwards? Or as a-letheia, uncovering the archaic truths concealed by Lethe's swirling waters? Should we seek to recapture a putative purity in the depth of our psyche or in the darkness of our archaic past? Or is truth rather before us, an achievement rather than a recollection? If so, should auld acquaintance be forgot and never brought to mind?

Détails de la publication

Publié dans:

Cohen Robert S, Tauber Alfred (1998) Philosophies of nature: the human dimension: in celebration of Erazim Kohák. Dordrecht, Springer.

Pages: 249-256

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-2614-6_18

Citation complète:

Kohák Erazim, 1998, Should auld acquaintance be forgot…?. In R.S. Cohen & A. Tauber (eds.) Philosophies of nature: the human dimension (249-256). Dordrecht, Springer.