Livre | Chapitre
Epistemic and semantic reflections on scientific realism
pp. 97-101
Résumé
Of the three points made by L.J. Cohen, I shall consider two: his refutation of irrealism and his argument that van Fraassen's version of irrealism is subject to the same difficulties van Fraassen has found with realism.
Détails de la publication
Publié dans:
Ullmann-Margalit Edna (1988) Science in reflection: the Israel colloquium: studies in history, philosophy, and sociology of science volume 3. Dordrecht, Springer.
Pages: 97-101
Citation complète:
Zemach Eddy M., 1988, Epistemic and semantic reflections on scientific realism. In E. Ullmann-Margalit (ed.) Science in reflection (97-101). Dordrecht, Springer.