Linguistique de l’écrit

Revue internationale en libre accès

Livre | Chapitre

180026

The case for explanation continued

a reply to professor Tugendhat

Philip Pettit

pp. 267-272

Résumé

The attempt to reply to a reply may seem inelegant; in the present case, however, I see it as necessary. Professor Tugendhat has presented his view of philosophy with great clarity, and related it to mine by criticism. I wish in turn to present my view through the criticism of his; if you like, I wish to complete the circle of debate.

Détails de la publication

Publié dans:

Mays Wolfe (1972) Linguistic analysis and phenomenology. Dordrecht, Springer.

Pages: 267-272

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-01215-2_19

Citation complète:

Pettit Philip, 1972, The case for explanation continued: a reply to professor Tugendhat. In W. Mays (ed.) Linguistic analysis and phenomenology (267-272). Dordrecht, Springer.