Livre | Chapitre
Carnap versus Quine, or aprioristic versus naturalized epistemology, or a lesson from dispositions
pp. 167-177
Résumé
The philosophical differences between Carnap and Quine were vast and principled in the end, or perhaps they only appeared so because the two were so close and because the points of divergence are so clearly traceable. Presently, the prevailing impression is that Quine has won the day, surely also simply because Quine survived Carnap by almost 30 years. Indeed, Carnap has lapsed, it seems, into what is only the historic background of the present situation.
Détails de la publication
Publié dans:
Bonk Thomas (2003) Language, truth and knowledge: contributions to the philosophy of Rudolf Carnap. Dordrecht, Springer.
Pages: 167-177
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-0151-8_10
Citation complète:
Spohn Wolfgang, 2003, Carnap versus Quine, or aprioristic versus naturalized epistemology, or a lesson from dispositions. In T. Bonk (ed.) Language, truth and knowledge (167-177). Dordrecht, Springer.