Neural representationalism, the hard problem of content and vitiated verdicts
a reply to Hutto & Myin (2013)
pp. 257-274
Résumé
Colombo's (Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 2013) plea for neural representationalism is the focus of a recent contribution to Phenomenology and Cognitive Science by Daniel D. Hutto and Erik Myin. In that paper, Hutto and Myin have tried to show that my arguments fail badly. Here, I want to respond to their critique clarifying the type of neural representationalism put forward in my (Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 2013) piece, and to take the opportunity to make a few remarks of general interest concerning what Hutto and Myin have dubbed "the Hard Problem of Content."
Détails de la publication
Publié dans:
(2014) Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 13 (2).
Pages: 257-274
DOI: 10.1007/s11097-014-9350-6
Citation complète:
Colombo Matteo, 2014, Neural representationalism, the hard problem of content and vitiated verdicts: a reply to Hutto & Myin (2013). Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 13 (2), 257-274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-014-9350-6.