Linguistique de l’écrit

Revue internationale en libre accès

Revue | Volume | Article

139383

Principles of structural phenomenology

a basic outline and commentary

Simone Aurora(Università degli Studi di Padova)Patrick Flack(Université de Fribourg)

pp. 151-169

Résumé

Structural phenomenology is both a general theory of experience and a scientific method, whose contours and potentially considerable explanatory power have been fundamentally obscured by its complex historical genesis. Barring a few partial or indirect attempts (Holenstein 1976, Piana 1996, Coquet 2007, Groupe µ 2015), no explicit analysis and certainly no synthetic account of its core tenets have been provided. Indeed, structural phenomenology has generally not been framed as a coherent tradition, theory or model in its own right. At best, the term seems to refer only to the indefinite conceptual space where structuralism and phenomenology have on occasion intersected. Because the works of Edmund Husserl, the Gestalt psychologists, Roman Jakobson, Maurice Merleau-Ponty or Jacques Derrida all provide, to varying extents, strong examples of productive convergences or intersections between these two traditions, it is nonetheless quite clear that explorations of structural-phenomenological ideas constituted not a fleeting episode, but a persistent undercurrent in 20th Century European intellectual history. As we hope to clarify here, moreover, it is possible not only to isolate a number of defining ideas in this existing nexus of exchanges between phenomenological and structuralist approaches, but also to distill these ideas into a set of consistent principles that can provide a first outline of the theoretical scope of structural phenomenology.

0Structural phenomenology is both a general theory of experience and a scientific method, whose contours and potentially considerable explanatory power have been obscured by its complex historical genesis. Barring a few partial or indirect attempts (e.g. Holenstein 1976, Piana 1996, Coquet 2007, Groupe µ 2015), no direct analysis and certainly no synthetic account of its core tenets have of yet been provided. Indeed, structural phenomenology has never been framed explicitly as a coherent tradition, theory or model in its own right. Rather, the term seems to refer only to the indefinite conceptual space where structuralism and phenomenology have on occasion intersected. Given that Edmund Husserl, Gestalt psychology, Roman Jakobson, Maurice Merleau-Ponty or Jacques Derrida all provide examples of productive conver­gences or intersections between these two traditions, it is nonetheless clear that what one might want to call « structural-phenomenological thought » constituted not a fleeting or marginal episode in 20th Century intellectual history, but a persistent undercurrent. As we hope to make clear, moreover, it is possible not only to identify a number of common ideas in the nexus of exchanges between phenomenological and structuralist approaches, but also to distill these ideas into a set of consistent principles that in turn provide an outline of structural phenomenology as a coherent theory and method.

Références

Aurora Simone, 2017, Filosofia e scienze nel primo Husserl: Per una interpretazione strutturalista delle Ricerche logiche. Padova, Cleup.

Coquet Jean-Claude, 2007, Phusis et Logos: une phénoménologie du langage. Paris, Presses Universitaires de Vincennes.

Derrida Jacques, 2005, Writing and difference. London-New York, Routledge. (Original work published 1967)

Espagne Michel, 2014, L'ambre et le fossil: Transferts germano-russes dans les sciences humaines XIXe-XXe siècle. Paris, Armand Colin.

Fine Kit, 1995, Part-Whole. In B. Smith & D.W. Smith (eds.) The Cambridge companion to Husserl (n/a). Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Flack Patrick, 2018, Idée, expression, vécu: La question du sens entre phénoménologie et structuralisme. Paris, Hermann.

Groupe µ , 2015, Principia semiotica. Paris, Les impressions nouvelles.

Hjelmslev Louis, 1961, Prolegomena to a theory of language. Madison, University of Wisconsin Press.

Holenstein Elmar, 1976, Roman Jakobson's approach to language: phenomenological structuralism (T. Schelbert & C. Schelbert, Trans.). Bloomington, Ind., Indiana University Press. (Original work published 1975)

Husserl Edmund, 1982, Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy I: General introduction to a pure phenomenology (F. Kersten, Trans.). Den Haag, Nijhoff. (Original work published 1913)

Moran Dermot, 2001, Logical investigations (Vols 1.-2). London, Routledge.

Jakobson Roman, 1971, Word and language. The Hague, Mouton.

Jakobson Roman, 1981, Poetry of grammar and grammar of poetry. The Hague-Paris-New York, Mouton.

Jakobson Roman, 1979, Poetik: Ausgewählte Aufsätze 1921-1971. . E. Holenstein & T. Schelbert (Eds.). Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp.

Piana Giovanni, 1996, Die Idee eines phänomenologischen Strukturalismus. In R. Cristin (Hrsg.) Phänomenologie in Italien (113-118). Würzburg, Königshausen & Neumann.

Piana Giovanni, 2013, L'idea di uno strutturalismo fenomenologico. In G. Piana Strutturalismo fenomenologico e psicologia della forma (5-15). Morrisville, NC, Lulu Press.

Pos Hendrik, 2013, Phénoménologie et linguistique. In H. Pos Ecrits sur le langage (193-206). Genève-Lausanne, sdvig press.

Sériot Patrick, 1999, Structure et totalité: Les origines intellectuelles du structuralisme en Europe centrale et orientale. Paris, Presses Universitaires de France.

Sonesson Göran, 2012, The meanings of structuralism: Considerations on structures and Gestalten. Segni e comprensione 26 (78), 84-101.

Détails de la publication

Publié dans:

De Angelis Rossana, Aurora Simone (2018) Phenomenology and structuralism. Acta Structuralica Special Issue 1.

Pages: 151-169

En ligne depuis: 18th April 2018

DOI: 10.19079/actas.2018.s1.151

Citation complète:

Aurora Simone, Flack Patrick, 2018, Principles of structural phenomenology: a basic outline and commentary. Acta Structuralica 1, Phenomenology and structuralism, 151-169. https://doi.org/10.19079/actas.2018.s1.151.